<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Free Football Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.luckylester.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.luckylester.com</link>
	<description>Free Football Picks &#38; Fantasy Football</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Five for Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/five-for-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/five-for-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cooley]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Keller]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Greg Olsen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Shockey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jim Zorn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Boss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Redskins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Splinter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coaching Newbies: I just couldn&#8217;t get enough of Jim Zorn&#8217;s mismanagement of the game on Thursday night - I almost had to quit watching the damn thing. With four minutes left, Jim is huddling down 9. Interesting. Of all people, he has to know about his dink and dunk west coast offense - hurry up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coaching Newbies</strong>: I just couldn&#8217;t get enough of Jim Zorn&#8217;s mismanagement of the game on Thursday night - I almost had to quit watching the damn thing. With four minutes left, Jim is huddling down 9. Interesting. Of all people, he has to know about his dink and dunk west coast offense - hurry up son! I like Jim and despite his shortcomings in Week 1 I think he will become a solid head guy for the Redskins. But doesn&#8217;t this show that there&#8217;s such thing as a rookie curve for coaches too? Its the first time Jim has ever been a head coach and he&#8217;s also calling plays - who does he think he is? Splinter Shannahan? Watch out for those rookie coaches, they&#8217;ll kill your fantasy guys too. Chris Cooley needed to get involved in this one - he&#8217;s a huge asset for the Redskins - yet he didn&#8217;t do anything. Talking about tight ends, do I drop Kevin Boss now that he didn&#8217;t catch a ball? Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Premature E-drop-ulation</strong>: You don&#8217;t want to let go of a guy because of one bad week, but in the case of Kevin Boss, a guy that was probably a very late TE pickup for you, you might want to head in the direction of a Dustin Keller or possibly Greg Olsen. Either guy is likely to be available still and it doesn&#8217;t look like Boss is going to be as big a part of the Giants offense as Jeremy Shockey was. Plus, you don&#8217;t lose that much by dropping him. Contrary to this advice, I wouldn&#8217;t drop someone you were high on because of one lousy week. Dropping Eli Manning because he didn&#8217;t do much would be ridiculous. So don&#8217;t do it if one of your pre-season sleepers poo&#8217;s the bed in Week 1. </p>
<p><strong>Do Hate</strong>: People often won&#8217;t pick a player because they hate him, or the team he plays for. TO is a prime example. I&#8217;ve drafted with Eagle fans that won&#8217;t touch the guy. Defenses are the best. Late you can often pick up the Cowboys, Vikings, or Jaguars because so many people either hate them or care less about them. Take advantage of that. There are lesser versions of these guys on waivers right now. Just because nobody likes Brandon Lloyd doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s useless - same goes for Antonio Bryant. Remember - at one time in their NFL careers, both of these guys were promising fantasy receivers, and it&#8217;s not as if they&#8217;re too old to get back the magic. Dream big, Hate as much as you want. Just don&#8217;t let it effect your fantasy cash winnings. Its true though, nothing is worse than hating your fantasy team and losing at the same time. I don&#8217;t suggest you do that either.</p>
<p><strong>Dallas Does Cleveland:</strong> I&#8217;m not saying much about this except - watch. The Cowboys are going to do what the Colts did to the Saints to start the &#8216;07 season, and many a people are going to be seen ripping out their hair because they put all their chips in the Brown doo-doo. Nobody likes brown doo-doo. But when this does happen, feel free to take advantage of those hair-rippers. Unlike you, most fantasy fans erupt prematurely like the apple pie kid. Week 1 and 2 are times where calm people build season-long dynasties.  </p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t do that</strong>: While rooting for your favorite team to pull a huge upset, please don&#8217;t be the guy that says, &#8220;I want them to win this, but it&#8217;d be nice if Tony Romo would throw a couple more touchdowns before it&#8217;s over.&#8221; That&#8217;s just not okay. You are a football fan first - remember that. Be loyal and just take the fantasy game as it falls. Rooting for a 56-55 game is just plain hopeless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/five-for-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three for Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/three-for-thursday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/three-for-thursday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Ravens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Denver Broncos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[McFadden]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Miami Dolphins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Jets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oakland Raiders]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ricky Williams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ronnie Brown]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Selvin Young]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got three more tidbits for you valued readers&#8230; Who else would give you this kind of love?
Chris Perry&#8230; Ravens - Ravens&#8230; Chris Perry: Poor guy. Chris Perry gets his first start in the NFL after being injured for what has seemed like his entire pro existence, and who does he get to try and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got three more tidbits for you valued readers&#8230; Who else would give you this kind of love?</p>
<p><strong>Chris Perry&#8230; Ravens - Ravens&#8230; Chris Perry</strong>: Poor guy. Chris Perry gets his first start in the NFL after being injured for what has seemed like his entire pro existence, and who does he get to try and stay healthy against? Oh, just the <a href="http://www.luckylester.com/nfl-teams/baltimore-ravens/" >Baltimore Ravens</a>. Hopefully he can catch the ball, because running it didn&#8217;t really pan out for opposing offenses last season. How many yards per rush do you think the Ravens gave up last year? 4? 3? Nope, try 2.8. Yes sir, 2.8 whole freaking yards. That&#8217;s the lowest in the league. Many would think that the Vikings were the best run defense last season because of all the hype that goes with their monstrous defensive line, and they did allow the least amount of total rushing yards, but no matter how hard opposing offenses tried, the Ravens wouldn&#8217;t budge. They were the only defense to keep opposing rushers under 3 yards per carry in &#8216;07. I&#8217;m guessing Perry doesn&#8217;t look like a million bucks his first time out. You have to go back to 2000 to find a defense that bettered the Ravens in &#8216;07, and what do you know, that was the Ravens. </p>
<p><strong>Shaven, no Bush</strong>: Reggie hasn&#8217;t had a stellar start to his young career, but the Bucs really seem to cut him down to size. In two contests against the Bucs in &#8216;07, Reggie rushed 23 times for 81 yards, 9 catches for 56 yards, zero touchdowns and 4 fumbles. In &#8216;06, during his rookie year, Reggie had 20 carries for 18 yards, 15 grabs for 85 yards, and no scores. In one game he had 11 carries for -5 yards with a long of 3. I like Reggie. I think he&#8217;ll be a good player in this league, and he&#8217;ll figure out how to hit a hole during his third season. But, he won&#8217;t do it on opening day - don&#8217;t put all your eggs in this Bush.</p>
<p><strong>Racking up the Yards</strong>: I know I talked about McFadden, Selvin Young, Thomas Jones, and the Ricky Williams/Ronnie Brown duo headed into this weekend&#8217;s games - but I found some more stuff that I just had to share. Only 3 teams gave up more rushing yards than the Jets. Only two teams gave up more rushing yards than the Broncos. Only one team gave up more on the ground than Oakland. And nobody allowed more rushing yards than the Dolphins. Lucky for you fan of the ground game, the Dolphins take on the Jets while the Raiders host the Broncos on Monday Night. This is what I call a tournament. The seedings would look like this&#8230; 4 @ 1 and 3 @ 2. I hope the winner gets to go to the Super Bowl - but that probably won&#8217;t happen. It&#8217;s a good week to own this group of fantasy backs. </p>
<p>Get back here at the end of the work week to read <strong>Five for Friday</strong>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/three-for-thursday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One for Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/one-for-wednesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/one-for-wednesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amani Toomer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Taylor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deion Branch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DeSean Jackson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Donald Lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not so Neon, but definitely DEION!: I just don&#8217;t get it. Sure, Deion Branch has never put up huge numbers and he was hurt last season and is still recovering from his injury - but how can he get ranked in the 160s to start the season? Some are being led to believe that he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so Neon, but definitely DEION!: I just don&#8217;t get it. Sure, Deion Branch has never put up huge numbers and he was hurt last season and is still recovering from his injury - but how can he get ranked in the 160s to start the season? Some are being led to believe that he won&#8217;t play in 2008, or he&#8217;ll miss the first half of the year. Give it a rest. This guy just started to practice and may miss a few games, but there is absolutely no reason he should be on a waiver wire in any league with more than 8 fantasy owners. Deion Branch will very likely lead the Seahawks in receiving this season. I&#8217;m willing to bet he plays just as many games as Steve Smith (Carolina&#8217;s Steve) and puts up his same solid numbers that he always puts up. I think it&#8217;d be perfect if he hit 1000 yards this season. No, Dominik Hixon, Donald Lee, Courtney Taylor, Marty Booker, and Jsoh Morgan should not be ranked ahead of him. This is a #1 receiver for a very good passing attack in Seattle. He&#8217;s hurt to start the season, but take full advantage of that. He had 49 catches for 661 yards and 4 scores in 11 total games played last season. That&#8217;s on pace for 80+ grabs 1000+ yards and 6 touchdowns. YES - he was that good when he was healthy. Buy low! Buy now! Don&#8217;t wait or you might be too late. Somebody else might come across this article and jump at the site of the other Deion sitting on the waivers. Don&#8217;t go drop Chad to pick up Deion, but please don&#8217;t sit on Amani Toomer or DeSean Jackson hoping that they&#8217;ll become what Deion already is. I can&#8217;t believe how low he&#8217;s being rated. 162 on ESPN&#8217;s Matthew Berry&#8217;s list. You&#8217;ve got to be kidding me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/one-for-wednesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free NCAA Football Picks: Week 2</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/free-ncaa-football-picks-week-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/free-ncaa-football-picks-week-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA Picks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BYU Cougars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Free Football Picks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Bulldogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jake Locker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Terrapins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NCAA Free Picks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[UW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Washington Huskies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Week 2 NCAA Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After busting through the opening weekend by picking a few great upsets and getting slapped around a little by some teams I respected, Week 2 shouldn&#8217;t be quite as exciting right? Wrong - I&#8217;m out to win them all. Not as many games as last week, but check out my DirecTV ESPN GamePlan picks if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>After busting through the opening weekend by picking a few great upsets and getting slapped around a little by some teams I respected, Week 2 shouldn&#8217;t be quite as exciting right? Wrong - I&#8217;m out to win them all. Not as many games as last week, but check out my DirecTV ESPN GamePlan picks if you want some more action. All my games are on Saturday this time around, so no mid-week dancing for me. Enjoy all 7 of my picks! I&#8217;m feeling pretty good about these ones.</p>
<h3>Saturday’s Games</h3>
<p><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Connecticut Huskies (-6)</strong></span> </span>@ Temple Owls: (12:00pm EST, 9-6-2008)</p>
<p>The Huskies learned how to win last season. Temple is improved, but they are still Temple. LIke a lot of teams, UCONN&#8217;s win last weak wasn&#8217;t indicative of how their season will play out. Sure, they won easily (against Hofstra) but they didn&#8217;t look good in all aspects of the game. They got a little taste of reality, and I like that. I like that they dealt with it, had a really down game, and still won 35-3. They play stout defense that will slap the Owls in the face at their hyped home opener. I like UCONN to dominate this game on both sides of the ball.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BYU Cougars (-9)</strong></span> @<span> <span style="font-weight: normal;">Washington Huskies</span></span>: (3:00pm EST, 9-6-2008)</p>
<p>The Huskies are a solid 1st half team - they are just brutal in the 2nd half of just about every game. Oregon was better than many people thought they were going to be, but they weren&#8217;t that good. The Huskies are a one-man attack (QB stud Jake Locker), and that doesn&#8217;t bode well for their chances against a good Cougar team. The Cougars come in winners of their last 10 games, and believe me, they&#8217;ve played tougher road games than they&#8217;ll play on Saturday. It wouldn&#8217;t stun me if the Cougars took this game by three touchdowns.</p>
<p><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Akron Zips (+5)</strong></span></span> @ Syracuse Orange: (3:30pm EST, 9-6-2008)</p>
<p>Syracuse has some talent, but the Zips can play the game. Akron can throw the all around pretty well with Chris Jacquemain at quarterback. They struggled a bit in the 2nd half against Wisconsin, but the Badgers are a very talented team. I think Akron will find plenty of open places in that Syracuse secondary. The Orange don&#8217;t have a rushing attack like Wisconsin does, so they won&#8217;t be able to bully the Zips like the Badgers did.</p>
<p>Central Michigan Chippewas @<strong> </strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Georgia Bulldogs (-23.5)</strong></span>: (3:30pm EST, 9-6-2008)</p>
<p>The Bulldogs are 4 scores better than the Chippewas. They gave up 21 points last week, and I&#8217;m willing to bet they don&#8217;t give up half that many this week against Central Michigan. Mathew Stafford looked solid against Georgia Southern, but everyone expected that. The Bulldogs basically did whatever they wanted including take it easy late against their instate opponent. They will obliterated Central Michigan. The Bulldogs were up 38-7 to start the 4th quarter, but Southern scored two 4th quarter touchdowns to bring the game within 24 points. Because of that the Bulldogs lost a few points in the polls as USC went ballistic against Virginia, beating them 52-7, and took the #1 spot this week.  I&#8217;m guessing the Bulldogs do some scoring in this one and try to get that top spot back in USC&#8217;s bye.</p>
<p><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Oregon State Beavers (+17</strong></span><strong>)</strong></span> @ Penn State Nittany Lions (3:30pm EST, 8-30-2008)</p>
<p>OSU sure didn&#8217;t look very good in their opening game of the season, but they are a better team than that so I&#8217;ll take them again. A glutton for punnishment? Maybe, but I like to believe in what I see, and I see a solid team in Beaverville. Offensively they have a lot of playmakers and a quarterback that can deliver the ball. I will take that and 17 points over any Penn State team. The Nittany Lions are overrated, and the Beavers are a good enough team to show everyone exactly that. An upset here wouldn&#8217;t stun me.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>West Virginia Moutaineers (-7.5)</strong></span> @ East Carolina Pirates: (10:00pm EST, 8-30-2008)</p>
<p>West Virginia allowed 21 points last week to college football&#8217;s version of nobody, while the East Carolina Pirates played some damn good football against the likes of the Hokies. East Carolina upset #17 Virginia Tech last week at home, and they&#8217;re looking to go 2-0 after facing two ranked teams back to back. Not gonna happen. The Pirates are a good club, don&#8217;t get me wrong, but VaTech was the most overrated team in the Top 25. The Mountaineers have something East Carolina has yet to see, an offense that can score on any defense in the nation. East Carolina won&#8217;t win a track meet with WV, and that&#8217;s what they&#8217;ll have to do to win. Remember, West Virginia held Villanova to one score through three quarters last week. Those 2 touchdowns brought this line down from double digits, I&#8217;d bet. I&#8217;ll take Pat White and his boys.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Maryland Terrapins (-12.5)</span></strong> @ Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders: The Terrapins had a really tough week and their starting quarterback didn&#8217;t play well. It won&#8217;t always be like that for a very good Maryland team. Luckily for you, and me, that first game is lodged in the minds of bettors and oddsmakers everywhere. Yhatzee for us! Maryland has great talent at receiver, a very tough defense, and a quarterback in Jordan Steffy that&#8217;s made a name for himself through his perseverance. I really like their chances against a very mediocre Blue Raider group.</p>
<p>These picks are good ones. Roll with them. Bet &#8216;em. And reap those benefits.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/free-ncaa-football-picks-week-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>theRUNDOWN: Week 1</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/therundown-week-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/therundown-week-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Papa Weimer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[theRUNDOWN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Berrien]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chris Johnson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marion Barber]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Matt Schaub]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Willie Parker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2008&#8217;s Week 1 is upon us. Thursday Night&#8217;s contest pitting the Giants against their in-conference rival Redskins makes for good TV, but does that match-up make for good fantasy fun? Hard to tell. I have a sleeper or two from that group, but as far as fantasy studs, I&#8217;ll stay away. These are my favorite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008&#8217;s Week 1 is upon us. Thursday Night&#8217;s contest pitting the Giants against their in-conference rival Redskins makes for good TV, but does that match-up make for good fantasy fun? Hard to tell. I have a sleeper or two from that group, but as far as fantasy studs, I&#8217;ll stay away. These are my favorite players to start, some sleepers, and some guys to avoid on Sunday - This is theRUNDOWN for Week 1 - write this down!</p>
<p><strong>QB:</strong> Kurt Warner vs. San Francisco: Last time Kurt played the Niners he approached 500 passing yards. He didn&#8217;t get it, but he surely sniffed it. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll do that kind of colossus damage, but he should be one of the best starting options in Week 1. I&#8217;ll take him as my quarterbacking bell-cow.</p>
<p><strong>RB:</strong> LaDainian Tomlinson vs. Carolina: I have to take LT because he&#8217;s scored on opening day in every single season but one in his NFL career. That&#8217;s something right? He doesn&#8217;t have the best match-up ever, but he&#8217;s still going to show the Panthers a thing or two.</p>
<p><strong>RB:</strong> Marion Barber vs. Cleveland: I know the Browns got much better defensively, but I just have a feeling. This is wear I put guys down that I have feelings about.</p>
<p><strong>WR:</strong> Randy Moss vs. Kansas City: Because why not? Moss is one of the best receivers in the game and he&#8217;s going to KC where nobody on the roster can guard him. Seems like a no-brainer.</p>
<p><strong>WR:</strong> Terrell Owens vs. Cleveland: Yes, I will start TO and Randy and smile the whole time. Cleveland&#8217;s secondary doesn&#8217;t stand much of a chance against the Cowboys passing attack - TO is a big reason why. The only guy I&#8217;d consider instead of Owens is Calvin Johnson, but I figured I&#8217;d start with Randy and TO and go from there.</p>
<p><strong>TE:</strong> Tony Scheffler vs. Oakland: Without Brandon Marshall I just have to believe Scheffler gets about 10 targets on Monday Night. That&#8217;s good enough for me to give him the nod.</p>
<p><strong>K:</strong> Josh Brown vs. Philadelphia: Brown struggled in the pre-season, making me wonder if Seattle can see the future. I doubt it though, why would they have resigned Shaunna Alexander if they could see the future? Its an ongoing joke that I can&#8217;t pick good kicking options- we&#8217;ll see if that continues through Week 1.</p>
<p><strong>D:</strong> Patriots vs. Kansas City: I just feel like the Patriots are pretty good and the KC offense is horrendous. Is that wrong?</p>
<h3>LUCKY’S Week 1 SLEEPERS</h3>
<p><strong>Matt Schaub:</strong> I think Warner could be a bit of a sleeper, but since I took him as my top option, he really doesn&#8217;t work here. In that case I&#8217;ll roll with Matt Schaub. I think he can do his part to torch the Steelers defense despite most people predicting a Pittsburgh beat down.</p>
<p><strong>Aaron Rodgers:</strong> You bet - this kid is going to be good. Why not start in Week 1 against a suspect secondary?</p>
<p><strong>Chris Johnson:</strong> He needs to make one guy miss and then run away from everyone else. I think CJ will be a lot like Maurice Jones Drew in MJD&#8217;s rookie run. Even against Jax, I like CJ as a sleeper.</p>
<p><strong>Maurice Morris:</strong> It seems like a lot of people don&#8217;t realize it, but Morris is the starter in Seattle. They go up against a Bills team that doesn&#8217;t do many things great defensively. I am willing to bet that Morris is a double digit fantasy scorer this Sunday.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Forte:</strong> This rookie goes up against the Colts. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying. He&#8217;s starter worthy.</p>
<p><strong>Nate Burleson:</strong> He&#8217;s the #1 target in Seattle and while that would normally give him the opposing defense&#8217;s best corner back, Buffalo really doesn&#8217;t have one of those. He&#8217;s a nice option on Sunday.</p>
<p><strong>Roddy White:</strong> After a great &#8216;07 season Roddy seemed to fall down in drafts for some reason. I wonder if it&#8217;s because Atlanta&#8217;s QB play last year was good and this year they have a rookie? Hmmm&#8230; Nope, they just cut the guy that started most of &#8216;07. I like Roddy no matter who is throwing him the ball.</p>
<p><strong>Robert Meachem:</strong> There&#8217;s a chance Meachem is the deep threat right off the bat in New Orleans. With Tampa giving Colston, Shockey, and Bush lots of attention I have a feeling Meachem could get loose for a couple big plays.</p>
<p><strong>Zach Miller:</strong> The Raiders will have to throw the ball to someone on Monday against Denver. Miller won&#8217;t be getting blanketed by Champ Bailey or Dre Bly. So yeah, I think he&#8217;s a top 12 starting option this weekend.</p>
<p><strong>Bengals:</strong> One would hate to ever have to start the Bengals week in and week out, but they should make some plays against the Ravens sputtering offense. (Yes, they will sputter early). There are worse defenses out there, and the Bengals have the playmakers to score a touchdown or two.</p>
<p><strong>LUCKY’S Week 1 Splinter-Butts</strong> (bench him, son)</p>
<p><strong>Drew Brees:</strong> The proof is there, this high scorer rarely does a lot of damage against the Bucs - if you have a decent back-up option, start him instead.</p>
<p><strong>Ryan Grant and Adrian Peterson:</strong> I don&#8217;t think either of these defensive lines will allow a 100 yard rusher in Week 1 - even though AP and Grant are beasts, this isn&#8217;t a good match-up for either of them.</p>
<p><strong>Bernard Berrien:</strong> I like BB&#8217;s chances to have a great season, but he just seems to get pushed around by the physical corners in Green Bay. We&#8217;ll see, but there&#8217;s a good chance that continues.</p>
<p><strong>Willie Parker:</strong> I like me some Fast Willie Parker, but I think Houston is much improved up front, and they will make Pittsburgh beat them through the air.</p>
<p>It looks like I&#8217;ll have a nice little team on my bench this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/therundown-week-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask Papa Weimer: Week 1 (&#8217;08)</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/ask-papa-weimer-week-1-08/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/ask-papa-weimer-week-1-08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Papa Weimer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football Q&amp;A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Peterson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Calvin Johnson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chris Johnson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[D.J. Hackett]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Addai]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Larry Johnson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Roy Williams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steven Jackson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets get right to it. You know the gig, you ask questions and I answer them. For God&#8217;s sake it&#8217;s not that freaking much of a scientific experiment to get all hoogily boogily about - but it is some sound advice that just might be able to help out this weekend. Let the games begin!
David [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets get right to it. You know the gig, you ask questions and I answer them. For God&#8217;s sake it&#8217;s not that freaking much of a scientific experiment to get all hoogily boogily about - but it is some sound advice that just might be able to help out this weekend. Let the games begin!</p>
<blockquote><p>David says, &#8220;I have Kevin Walter and Eddie Royal as backups, and while i like both of their respective upsides, would you drop one f them to pick up one of the following players? - Deion Branch, DJ Hackett, Donte Hall, Jabar Gaffney, Steve Breaston&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Boy, I would say that I like DJ and Branch just as much as I like Walter - and Royal is a rookie receiver so the chances of him being a good option right off teh bat just aren&#8217;t as good - but, I really like Royal, think he&#8217;s the best receiver in the draft, and I&#8217;d hang on to him for a week just to see how he&#8217;s used in Denver. I love Hackett, really, last year I thought he was the best receiver in Seattle. Now he gets to play opposite Steve Smith - if he stays healthy - and that if is harder to comeby with him than just about anyone else. Gaffney, you&#8217;re right about him, there&#8217;s reason to be intrigued by the guy playing #3 in that offense. BUt I don&#8217;t think his upside is as high as DJ, Branch, Royal, or Walter - so I&#8217;d stikc with the guys you have. THe biggest sure thing you have is Deion Branch. I would pick him up and drop Walter right now. Branch is supposed to play in Week 3 or after their week 4 bye&#8230; He&#8217;s a stud. He&#8217;ll likely be Seattle&#8217;s #1 when he gets back and he&#8217;ll play 12 games thi syear - that&#8217;s worth a roster spot. Dropping Walter won&#8217;t kill you. He could be good this year, but I don&#8217;t think his upside is 1000 yards and 8 touchdowns, so you don&#8217;t have to keep him because both Hackett and Branch do have that upside. You could drop Royal - Walter is a safer bet than Royal, but I&#8217;m not a huge safe bet guy in this respect - take the guy with the most ability: that&#8217;s my motto - that&#8217;s Royal.</p>
<blockquote><p>Slick Doug from Bremerton asks, &#8220;Who would you start at running back between these four soldiers? Adrian Peterson, Thomas Jones, Steven Jackson, and Michael Turner - I can only start two.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Not many people are going to like this, but I would roll without AP in my starting lineup for Week 1. I know, it seems just crazy enough to predict that I am soon to be described as senile - but what if I&#8217;m right? Thomas Jones plays the Dolphins, Jackson plays the Eagles, and Turner has to go up against that old run-stuffing juggernaut in Detroit. AP plays against a very good and young Packers defense and he won&#8217;t have the luxury of his pro-bowl offensive tackle, Bryant McKinnie, to help pave the way. Losing a stud on the outside is a tough deal, especially against Green Bay. You&#8217;ve done a great job grabbing back-ups, and this is a good time to use that flexibility. If you can handle sitting two of the best backs in the league, I would go with Mike Turner and Thomas Jones - but that&#8217;s just me. I think Steven Jackson is a nice option though, so he could be the answer. The Eagles aren&#8217;t a great run-defense by any means, and if Jackson hadn&#8217;t missed the entire pre-season I would go with him. I just think Jones and Turner get 20+ carries easily, and that will be good enough for the girls I go with.</p>
<blockquote><p>Davis in Dillingham, AK writes, &#8220;Even us Alaska folk play fantasy football - but we also have questions. I recently got a full dynasty keeper league trade offer from my buddy, Calvin Johnson and Larry Johnson for Jospeh Addai and Roy Williams. I love Calvin - would you do it?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Tough call Davis. To start with I&#8217;ve been in Dillingham a couple times, been up fishing for salmon once or twice, haha. Tough climate up there in the Winter, eh? Anyway, it doesn&#8217;t seem like good value - your trade that is. Addai is so young and part of a great offense that gives him lots of red zone looks without wearing him down. I like LJ but I would be surprised if he has many years left in his tank - plus the Chiefs abuse his body something fierce. Like I said, I love Calvin Johnson but he&#8217;s not that huge of an upgrade to Roy Williams. Williams is getting a bad wrap this season, but before his injury he was just about on pace to match his 2006 numbers last year. He&#8217;ll be a good option, and Addai is much better than LJ for the future. Hold your cards!</p>
<blockquote><p>Tiny Tim in Wyoming asks, &#8220;Do you have any crazy sleeper advice headed in to Week 1? Any guy that I should get my hands on before I lose a chance?</p></blockquote>
<p>If Chris Perry is still on your waiver wire, I&#8217;d grab him. The same goes for Chris Johnson and DJ Hackett. Hackett has been dropped by a lot of people recently, because of his pre-season ailments, but he should start and have a very good chance to look good in week 1. I say go for one of these three guys because they all have tough defensive match-ups, and if they play well right off the bat, their stock will go sky high. All 3 have a nice chance to really produce this season if they stay healthy. Chris Johnson is a favorite here at LL.com.</p>
<p>Okay, remember, if you want your fantasy questions answered, just send an email to <a href="mailto:papaweimer50@hotmail.com">papaweimer50@hotmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/ask-papa-weimer-week-1-08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Papa&#8217;s Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/papas-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/papas-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Papa Weimer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Papa Weimer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chris Johnson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[James Hardy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LenDale White]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Terrell Owens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vince Young]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what, I&#8217;m old and these damn computer things seem to get the best of me at every turn. I need glasses to watch the game, and sometimes I yell &#8220;fumble&#8221; while sitting all by myself on my big ass chair in my big ass living room on my big ass. Oh, and sometimes there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what, I&#8217;m old and these damn computer things seem to get the best of me at every turn. I need glasses to watch the game, and sometimes I yell &#8220;fumble&#8221; while sitting all by myself on my big ass chair in my big ass living room on my big ass. Oh, and sometimes there was no fumble at all - forgot to mention that. In fact, I seem to forget from time to time as well. Screw it, all that jazz doesn&#8217;t even matter because when it comes to football I surely know my game. I&#8217;ve said some things that have been wrong, but that only accounts for 3 instances in my football existence. So, when asked to do my predictions I figured, what the hell. Sure, the nephew might be able to actually keep tabs on the things I predict now, but that just gives me one more chance to prove my football knowledge dominance in this family tree. Let the predictions begin with glory and rapture!!!</p>
<p> </p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Vince      Young - Top 5 fantasy quarterback in leagues that award only 4 points for      throwing touchdowns.</li>
<li>LenDale      - more fantasy points than Chris Johnson in every format, except maybe PPR      - that will be a close race. </li>
<li>Earnest      Graham won&#8217;t get 20+ carries in more than 3 games this season - and that      bites into his value.</li>
<li>Deion      Branch - best fantasy receiver in Seattle (total points).</li>
<li>LeSean      McCoy will be a better professional running back than Beanie Wells - and      he will be something (draft him in leagues where that&#8217;s a part of it).</li>
<li>Willis      McGahee - 1200+ rushing yards for the Ravens.</li>
<li>Edgerrin      James will break the 1000-yard mark once again.</li>
<li>My      nephew thinks Calvin Johnson will be a Top 15 WR - he&#8217;ll be a Top 5 WR -      my nephew will edit this article and I thank him for that.</li>
<li>Matt      Ryan - much better fantasy quarterback than Joe Flacco this season - but      neither will bust the Top 20.</li>
<li>Chad      Pennington will bust the Top 20, and throw at least 20 touchdowns if he      plays more than 12 games.</li>
<li>Jerchio      Cotchery - easily outscore Coles in New York.</li>
<li>Selvin      Young - the leading rusher in the NFL headed into Week 7.</li>
<li>Kurt      Warner will get hurt in the first four weeks, allowing Matt Leinart to      take the starting job back and keep it for the duration of the season -      the entitled little bastard.</li>
<li>DeAngelo      Williams gets 66% of the carries in Carolina and rush for 1000+ yards for      the first time in his career.</li>
<li>Dustin      Keller - Top 10 fantasy tight end by seasons end.</li>
<li>So      will Greg Olsen.</li>
<li>Nate      Burleson - scores double digit touchdowns in Seattle again.</li>
<li>Steve      Slaton will lead the Texans backfield, and will approach 80 receptions.</li>
<li>Marion      Barber - best running back this season in fantasy land.</li>
<li>Brain      Westbrook won&#8217;t play more than 11 games - as much as I love the guy.</li>
<li>Chris      Perry - top 15 fantasy running back.</li>
<li>Frank      Gore - top 5 fantasy back.</li>
<li>Randy      Moss - catches less than 15 touchdowns, but still has a great season -      more catches this year.</li>
<li>Chad      Johnson figures out that the Bengals don&#8217;t have a chance by Week 6 -      that&#8217;s when he opts for season ending surgery - he gets traded in 2009.</li>
<li>The      SeaChickens don&#8217;t win the NFC West this year.</li>
<li>Neither      do the freaking Niners.</li>
<li>LT      scores in each of his first four games to start the season.</li>
<li>Adrian      Peterson won&#8217;t break the Top 5 running back list in 2008.</li>
<li>Willie      Parker revisits his 2006 form and finishes the year with 1300+ yards and 9      touchdowns or more. (nephew thinks this is crazy old man speak)</li>
<li>Plaxico      Burress - his best statistical season, don&#8217;t believe my nephew&#8217;s bad      ju-ju.</li>
<li>Steve      Smith - will be the #2 in New York and catch 65 balls at least.</li>
<li>Steve      Smith - Carolina&#8217;s best weapon puts up 12 touchdowns and finishes in the      Top 5 amongst per-game fantasy receiver.</li>
<li>Brandon      Marshall - does work in Denver, grabbing 100+ balls in 15 games.</li>
<li>Rookie      receiver James Hardy will lead all rookie receivers in touchdowns.</li>
<li>Tony      Scheffler - Top 5 TE.</li>
<li>The      Ravens will lose at least 12 games.</li>
<li>Santana      Moss - ready? - 1300+ yards, 9+ touchdowns, 80+ grabs - believe it. </li>
<li>Ronald      Curry finally meets my nephew&#8217;s expectations now that he hasn&#8217;t said      anything about him recently - 1000+ yards and 6 or more scores in 08.</li>
<li>Chris      Henry - more touchdowns for the Bengals than Chad Johnson gets.</li>
<li>Adam      &#8220;Pacman&#8221; Jones never gets in trouble again - he also plays offense a      little this season and scores at least 4 touchdowns.</li>
<li>Jamal      Lewis will be a great buy-low candidate after Week 3 - get him then and      reap the benefits. (nephew thinks this is a great call)</li>
<li>Ryan      Grant is going to be a beast - 1400 yards and 14 touchdowns are not out of      the question.</li>
<li>Reggie      Bush - 10+ total touchdowns this season, his highest total of his career.</li>
<li>Deuce      McAllister will lead the Saints in rushing yards -even on 3 bad knees.</li>
<li>Maurice      Jones Drew - 200+ carries for 1200+ yards and scores at least 14 times -      and welcome to JD being a Top 5 fantasy pick for the next 4 years.</li>
<li>Tarvaris      Jackson - 20+ touchdowns for the Vikings. (interesting says the nephew)</li>
<li>So      does Jason Campbell, but not for the Vikings.</li>
<li>Anquan      Boldin catches more balls than Larry Fitzgerald.</li>
<li>Marvin      Harrison catches 80+ balls and scores between 8-12 times.</li>
<li>Terrell      Owens will lead all receivers in touchdowns - damn his black heart. </li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/papas-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fantasy Fun: Ten for Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/fantasy-fun-ten-for-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/fantasy-fun-ten-for-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Brett Favre]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ricky Williams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ten for Tuesday]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve decided to throw out some fantasy advice, free of charge. Every single week I&#8217;m going to put some good stuff out for you to mull over in your fantasy minds. The articles will be entitled, &#8220;Ten for Tuesday&#8221; &#8220;One for Wednesday&#8221; &#8220;Three for Thursday&#8221; and &#8220;Five for Friday&#8221;. Each article will dive into as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided to throw out some fantasy advice, free of charge. Every single week I&#8217;m going to put some good stuff out for you to mull over in your fantasy minds. The articles will be entitled, &#8220;Ten for Tuesday&#8221; &#8220;One for Wednesday&#8221; &#8220;Three for Thursday&#8221; and &#8220;Five for Friday&#8221;. Each article will dive into as many fantasy observations as the title insists - 10 on tuesday, 1 on wednesday, and so in and so forth. The observations could, can, and will be anything that crosses my mind as important information. My goal is to sift through the irrelative fantasy junk and give you a few important tidbits prior to Sunday&#8217;s roster deadlines - 19 tidbits in fact. Since it is Tuesday, I&#8217;m on the books for 10 - good luck.</p>
<p>1.<strong> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sitting AP in Week 1</span>:</strong> Adrian Peterson goes up against a pretty tough <a href="http://www.luckylester.com/nfl-teams/green-bay-packers/" >Green Bay Packers</a> defense, and while that won&#8217;t be reason to sit him (as you certainly drafted him with your first round pick), the fact that his starting pro-bowl offensive tackle is out with a 4-game suspension might give you a couple second thoughts if you have a couple running backs with better match-ups as your 3rd options (Thomas Jones against the Dolphins, Mike Turner against the Lions for example) you might want to take that shot. I know that most of you won&#8217;t, and I&#8217;m going to have a hard time doing it in the league I have AP in, but it&#8217;s something to consider. Remember there is no player too good for a bad week - and it&#8217;s not looking sunny for AP in Green Bay.</p>
<p>2. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Running Men in Miam</span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>i</strong></span>: It&#8217;s going to be a run fest in Miami this weekend when Brett Favre and the Jets come to the beach. A lot of people think Brett is going to bring instant passing totals to Jet games, but considering that both the Dolphins and Jets have terrible run-defenses, I can&#8217;t see either quarterback putting up much more than 200 yards through the air. Thomas Jones, Leon Washington, Ricky Williams, and Ronnie Brown will all get their chances to shine, and 300+ yards rushing between the four of them won&#8217;t surprise me.</p>
<p>3. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Welcome to the Barber Shop</strong></span>: Marion Barber is going to beast defenses all season long, and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll waste time - he&#8217;s starting in Week 1. Sure, the Browns added Shaun Rogers and Corey Williams, but I still think Barber will rush for over 100 yards with a couple scores in Cleveland. We&#8217;ll see right away how much those huge off-season purchases do - will they change the entire defense? I doubt it, this unit in Cleveland is still sub-par.</p>
<p>4. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mr. Warner&#8217;s Neighborhood:</span></strong> It&#8217;s official, Kurt Warner has busted Matt Leinart&#8217;s bubble by plucking the starting job right out from under him. We heard all along that Warner and Leinart were on even playing ground, but nobody believed it until Kurt was named the starter. Now he goes up against a 49ers defense that he torched for 484 yards last time out. I&#8217;m not thinking he&#8217;s going for 484 again, but over 300 yards is very likely - so feel free to start him over guys you picked in the first 8 rounds of the draft - it&#8217;s not time to pretend you have a better starting option than the former MVP.</p>
<p>5. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Earnest goes to New Orleans</span></strong>: Earnest went a lot of places in the 80s and 90s, but I never saw him throwing beads around the streets in New Orleans - this is a new Earnest and you can bet on him doing work against the Saints. I&#8217;m sure New Orleans will be better against the run this season, but they still won&#8217;t be good. Graham has a nice offensive line and while he&#8217;s gone under the radar a bit in the pre-season, he&#8217;s still a great option this week.</p>
<p>6. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">In Orton I Trust:</span></strong> Kyle Orton will outscore half of these quarterbacks in Week 1 - ready, Brett Favre, Carson Palmer, Eli Manning, David Garrard, Derrick Anderson, Trent Edwards, Jeff Garcia, and Drew Brees. He&#8217;ll have a good game against a Colts secondary that is beginning to look very suspect. Think I&#8217;m crazy? You just wait and see.</p>
<p>7. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">100% of the time, almost Every Time</span></strong>: If LaDainian Tomlinson doesn&#8217;t score a touchdown in Week 1 of the regular season it will be just the second time in his career. That&#8217;s right, this scoring machine has visited the end-zone on opening day every single year but once. Can you say consistency? You bet. He has had ups and downs in yardage during week 1, but a running back (or any position) that scores is a guy you want to start. Craziness&#8230;</p>
<p>8. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">4 INTS for Brady?</span></strong>: Last time Tom Brady played the Chiefs he tossed 4 interceptions in a 16-26 loss. That&#8217;s half as many picks as he threw all of last year. That was 2005, sure, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t vintage Brady. This week a banged up and likely to be rusty Tom goes up against the Chiefs for the first time since they bruised his ego with all those picks. Will he toss the same number in touchdowns? I&#8217;m not sold. Expect a few blunders from the million dollar man - but he&#8217;ll figure it out late and pull the Pats out with a win. Just don&#8217;t expect that huge vintage 2007 Brady performance.</p>
<p>9. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Poor Man&#8217;s Reggie Bush?</span></strong>: Don&#8217;t buy that crappy scouting tip - Chris Johnson is a smart man&#8217;s Reggie Bush. This is why, the Titans didn&#8217;t have to spend 50 million bucks or a #2 overall pick on Chris, and he&#8217;s going to be better than Reggie. He&#8217;s faster and less afriad of contact. He hits the hole with a mission and can catch the ball too. Oh, and he&#8217;s faster. His game speed is just as fast as the 4.2 track speed insists. His pro career starts this week against a good Jaguars defense, but he&#8217;ll make someone look silly - just don&#8217;t miss out, you&#8217;ll surely miss a highlight.</p>
<p>10. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Selvin Young VS Darren McFadden:</span></strong> Lets put it this way, the yards battle will go to Selvin while the fantasy point title will end in McFadden&#8217;s favor. Those that were expecting McFadden to stumble in his rookie campaign can either jump on his bandwagon or be exposed later in the season - he can really run. The Broncos still don&#8217;t have an apt defensive line, and that doesn&#8217;t bode well for them. What is nice is the fact that Oakland doesn&#8217;t have a run-defense either, and this battle of first year starting backs should be fun to watch. Young is a sophomore, but with the starter&#8217;s keys in his hands it will be fun to see what he does with them. I like both these guys as starting options in Week 1 with McFadden getting the nod because of his knack for finding the end-zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/fantasy-fun-ten-for-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DIRECTV - ESPN GamePlan Free NCAA Picks: Week 2</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/directv-espn-gameplan-free-ncaa-picks-week-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/directv-espn-gameplan-free-ncaa-picks-week-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA Picks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Auburn Tigers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boston College]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Bulls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DirecTV ESPN GamePlan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Free NCAA Football Picks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NCAA Football]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tulane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my readers asked me to cap all of DirecTV&#8217;s GamePlan picks during the season. I looked into it a little bit and figured I could give my insight on these games every week during the year without too many tears being shed. This will be in addition to my normal college picks every [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my readers asked me to cap all of DirecTV&#8217;s GamePlan picks during the season. I looked into it a little bit and figured I could give my insight on these games every week during the year without too many tears being shed. This will be in addition to my normal college picks every single week, because those picks are the one&#8217;s I find the most value in. Again, these are all the games that DirecTV has in their college football package for Week 2&#8217;s games. Enjoy and good luck! A couple games didn&#8217;t have lines, but these are the ones that did - 6 DTV package games for your viewing (and betting) pleasure.</p>
<p><em>All games take place on Saturday the 6th!</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (+7)</span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span>@ Boston College Eagles (12:00PM EST):</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not crazy about this game. I&#8217;m taking the points because both teams are led by their defense and pose a lot of questions on offense. Georgia Tech runs the ball very effectively, but the Eagles have a stout defense to combat that upside. The Eagles have won ATS in 4 of the 5 contests between these schools, and have won last season 24-10. I still like Tech&#8217;s ability to keep this game within reach, and turn the Eagles young offense over a couple times. I&#8217;m taking Tech.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles (+18)</span></strong> @<strong> </strong>Auburn Tigers<strong> </strong>(12:30PM EST):</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t be too easy for the Tigers. Southern Miss has a few great athletes that could give the TIgers some trouble. Austin Davis (QB) will be good enough to put the ball in the air at Auburn, but it will be the Southern Miss rushing attack that does their share of damage. I understand last week&#8217;s game was against UL Lafayette, but still, the Golden Eagles had two backs rush for over 100 yards including Damion Fletcher&#8217;s 222 yard 2 touchdown performance. Any team with a running game is a good (+17) bet against a mediocre offense. Take the Golden Eagles.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cincinnati Bearcats (+21.5)</span></strong> @ Oklahoma Sooners (3:30PM EST):</p>
<p>This game looks a little scary for the Sooners, except for the fact that they are one of the Nation&#8217;s best teams. The Bearcats have a very good defense that will kick and scratch all night long if it means they have a chance. Offensively, the Bearcats will struggle to score at Oklahoma, but I still like their chances of keeping this game within that huge 3 touchdown margin. The Sooners are good, but not good enough to beat everyone in the 57-2 range like they did last week. I&#8217;ll take the Sooners to win by 10, but the Bearcats will make it a battle.</p>
<p>Mississippi @ <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wake Forest Demon Deacons (-8)</span></strong> (3:30PM EST):</p>
<p>The Demon Deacons did Baylor dirty last week on the road. The Bears looked lost as Wake marched through their defense to win 41-13. Riley Skinner is for real, and so are the Deacons. Being lost in the mess of ACC peers, Wake should continue to get favorable lines. Eight points to cover against a decent but not great Mississippi team seems easily manageable. Wake isn&#8217;t a team that&#8217;s going to win a lot of games by 20 points, but this could be one of the few times they do.</p>
<p>Buffalo Bulls @ <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Pittsburgh Panthers (-13)</span></strong> (6:00PM EST):</p>
<p>Buffalo mangled UTEP in week 1, as quarterback Drew Willy completed 10 passes for 221 yards and 4 touchdowns. The Bulls also managed two 100 yard rushers, as RB James Starks took 31 carries for 179 yards. But that was UTEP, can they really do the same thing against a team like Pittsburgh? I don&#8217;t think so. But they don&#8217;t have to do the same thing against Pitt to win against the spread. But I&#8217;ll have to go with Pitt here. Sure, they lost to Bowling Green last week, but the Falcons are much better than advertised, and their offensive attack is a bad match-up for the Panthers. This week, Pittsburgh has to shut down the run to win, and I like their chances at that a lot more. LeSean McCoy will have his way with the Bulls, and I like the Panthers come back from last week&#8217;s opening day loss to win by at least two touchdowns.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tulane Green Wave (+30.5)</span></strong> @ Alabama Crimson Tide (7:00PM EST):</p>
<p>After being moved around a lot because of Hurricane Gustav, and being thoroughly outmatched by the Tide athletically, the Tulane Green Wave are in for more tough times this weekend. Alabama may have played perfect football last week against a good Clemson team, but even so, they have definitely show that they are better than advertised. But that doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;ll be taking the Tide in this one. A 30 point favorite is too much for me to buy. The Tide come in hot on bettor&#8217;s minds, and that&#8217;s never a good thing for the favorite. Tulane plays teams pretty tough. They lost a lot in Matt Forte, but in their season opener I expect enough excitement to keep this game closer than 4 touchdowns. Alabama is a tough match-up for Tulane, as their run defense is stellar, but that won&#8217;t stop the Green Wave from handing the ball off, and their schemes are good enough to get some first downs. John Parker Wilson will come back to earth in this one. We&#8217;ll see, but I&#8217;m not buying the Tide beating many more teams by four scores&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/directv-espn-gameplan-free-ncaa-picks-week-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCAA Free Picks REVIEW: Week 1</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/ncaa-free-picks-review-week-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/ncaa-free-picks-review-week-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Football Pick Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bowling Green]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cal Bears]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Free Picks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Week 1 NCAA Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Week 2 NCAA Free Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=1695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, well - a winner is a winner is a winner I guess. When you win more than you lose it all works out. It wasn&#8217;t as hard as it sounds. I picked 10 games of Week 1&#8217;s action and finished 6-4. There were a couple tough ones, (cough, cough - Vanderbilty/Miami-Ohio - cough) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well - a winner is a winner is a winner I guess. When you win more than you lose it all works out. It wasn&#8217;t as hard as it sounds. I picked 10 games of Week 1&#8217;s action and finished 6-4. There were a couple tough ones, (cough, cough - Vanderbilty/Miami-Ohio - cough) and some really nice upsets that I pulled off as well (go Bowling Green) - this is the review&#8230;</p>
<p>Vanderbilt Commodores @ <strong><span>Miami-Ohio Redhawks (-4):</span><span> (loss)</span></strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Vanderbilt loses their best player in wide receiver Earl Bennett. He was by far their most effective and productive offensive player. Their leading returning receiver is out with a stress fracture (George Smith). If that weren’t enough, the Commodores also said goodbye to their leading rusher from last year, as well as their entire starting offensive line - that’s the kicker. The Commodores don’t have much cohesion right now, as new starters are still being decided. The starting quarterback for this Thursday’s game wasn’t decided by the weekend, leaving much to be answered in the four days before kickoff. While Vanderbilt has all the questions, Miami of Ohio looks to be full of answers.&#8221; (Me) Well, I guess I was wrong about this one. Still, I read everything going into this game and it looks like a tough go for the Commodores. Luckily they named the right QB as Chris Nickson rushed 20 times for 166 yards, tormenting Miami-Ohio&#8217;s defense. It all sounded good to me, I guess I can&#8217;t always know.</p>
<p><strong><span>Wake Forest Demon Deacons (-12)</span></strong> @ Baylor Bears: (WINNER)</p>
<p>&#8220;Wake Forest is the real deal. I expect them to start off the season hot, and ride their quarterback to the top of the ACC. Take them over the Bears by a couple touchdowns.&#8221; I couldn&#8217;t have predicted this game any better, except a couple touchdowns turned into 4 touchdowns. Riley Skinner lit up the Bears to the tune of 27 for 36 with 220 yards and 3 touchdown passes. The Deacons defense was stout, holding the Bears to just 6 points through 3 quarters.</p>
<p><strong><span>Oregon State Beavers (-3)</span></strong> @ Stanford Cardinal: (9:00pm EST, 8-28-2008)</p>
<p>The Beavers fell down early and when they were just about to get up, or score the game tying touchdown, their young wide receiver fumbled the ball through the end-zone, ending what would have been one heck of a come back for me. The Beavers lost by 8. The Cardinal did it on the ground while putting up just enough points to win despite Lyle Moevao&#8217;s 404 passing yards and 4 TD passes. I was 1-2 before the weekend even started.</p>
<h3>Friday’s Game</h3>
<p><strong></strong><br />
<span><strong>Temple Owls (-7</strong>)</span> @ Army Black Knights: (7:00pm EST, 8-29-2008)</p>
<p>&#8220;Temple, amazingly, won 4 of their last 7 games, have three Pre-Seasons All Conference players returning, and were voted “Program on the Rise” by the MAC conference. They return their leading passer and an offensive line that found cohesion late last year. Defensively, Temple is better than expected, as Army will find out. Army switched their entire offense around this summer, moving from a no-huddle spread to an option based rushing attack. When that happens originally, teams seem to struggle because of the recruiting differences for offenses like that. I never thought I’d consider taking a Temple team on the road and favored by a touchdown, but that’s exactly what I’m doing and I’m confident about it.&#8221; Sometimes I can really pick them. Temple held Army scoreless in the first half while putting up 21 points of their own. The game ended at 35-7 and Temple looked good carrying my win on their backs.</p>
<h3>Saturday’s Games</h3>
<p><strong></strong><br />
<span><strong>Bowling Green Falcons (+13) </strong></span>@ Pittsburgh Panthers: (WINNER)</p>
<p>&#8220;The Bowling Green Falcons bring 17 of 22 starters back to a team that is expected to compete for a WAC crown this season. The Falcons won 5 of their last 6 regular season games in 2007 before getting absolutely crushed in their bowl game against Tulsa. I like that last part. The Falcons have waited all summer, 17 returning starters and many other frustrated kids, to get back on the football field and prove that bowl game was a fluke. In comes the Panthers with one of the best running backs in the Nation and a former pro-football head coach. I like the Falcons’ chances - take them and all those points.&#8221; YES! Bowling Green pulled one of the weekend&#8217;s biggest stunners and I was right there to pat them on the back. I have to admit, I was a little worried when LeSean McCoy and company marched down the field for a score, and then went up 14-0. But the Falcons were resilient and finished off the Panthers 27-17.</p>
<p>Akron Zips @<span><strong> Wisconsin Badgers (-26</strong>)</span>: (tough loss)</p>
<p>Akron&#8217;s 4th quarter touchdown killed me, taking this game from a two point cover to a 5 point loss. It&#8217;s always tough with big spreads, which is why I like to stay away from them for the most part - but up 38-10, the Badgers kicked me right in the junk when they allowed Akron to throw a touchdown pass with 38 seconds left on the clock. Now that&#8217;s a bad freaking beat!</p>
<p><span><strong>Utah Utes (+3.5)</strong></span> @ Michigan Wolverines: (3:30pm EST, 8-30-2008)</p>
<p>&#8220;The Utes are very good and should win their conference this season. Michigan lost too many good players and are in the midst of a complete turn-around with their new head coach, Rich Rodriguez. I don’t know what else to say besides this, Utah is the better team with a better mentality and they also have nothing to lose in this one. Sign me up for that every single week.&#8221; The Utes made this closer than it had to be, but I&#8217;m still not that impressed with the Wolverines. They rode a little momentum late but the better team was Utah all day long. The game ended with the better team winning.</p>
<p><span><strong>Oklahoma State Cowboys (-6)</strong></span> @ Washington State Cougars: (WINNER)</p>
<p>&#8220;The Cougars weren’t very good a year ago, usually open the season soft, don’t have much of a home-field advantage during the first few weeks of the college football season, lost their star quarterback to graduation, and don’t have much confidence either. Hmm…&#8221; What else can you say? I wasn&#8217;t real surprised when I won this one in the first quarter. End of game score, 39-13- Cougs, thanks for playing - see you next week.</p>
<p><span><strong>Michigan State Spartans (+5)</strong></span><strong> </strong>@ California Golden Bears (loss)</p>
<p>This game was close, but the Bears looked better than the Spartans all night long. Sometimes I feel robbed after a loss, but that wasn&#8217;t the case here. The Bears looked solid defensively despite the big score at the end of the game. MSU fought hard at the end of the game but in the end Cal had the better athletes and it showed. Still, I was just a field goal away from winning this one.</p>
<p>Idaho Vandals @ <span><strong>Arizona Wildcats (-27)</strong></span>: (WINNER)</p>
<p>&#8220;It seems like a lot of points, and it is, but I just have a feeling&#8230; &#8230;This game wouldn’t surprise me if it was a 45-7 WIldcat blowout.&#8221; It would however surprise me if the Wildcats put up 70 in this one. Try a 35 point 2nd quarter and a 70-0 final score. Yikes. Like I said, I just had a feeling.</p>
<p>6-4 overall with a few huge wins a couple tough losses - such is the way it goes. Tune in tomorrow for some Week 2 Free NCAA Picks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luckylester.com/2008/09/ncaa-free-picks-review-week-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
