<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clueless Voters &#8211; 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.luckylester.com/2009/02/clueless-voters-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2009/02/clueless-voters-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clueless-voters-1</link>
	<description>100% Free Football Picks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: luckylester</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2009/02/clueless-voters-1/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>luckylester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=2590#comment-389</guid>
		<description>viking-fella,

I see where you&#039;re coming from, but it was not my intention to claim one thing or another. i was just saying that the voters didn&#039;t have a flying chance to do anything against a sniper like Ovechkin. In goal, that makes the most sense, and that being said, I don&#039;t even think 80% of the people would be willing to give it a shot. That being said, trying to stop Ovechkin as a goalie is probably exactly what the authors of the poll had intended, so next time I&#039;ll try to get more of a clue when I&#039;m writing my clueless response. Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>viking-fella,</p>
<p>I see where you&#8217;re coming from, but it was not my intention to claim one thing or another. i was just saying that the voters didn&#8217;t have a flying chance to do anything against a sniper like Ovechkin. In goal, that makes the most sense, and that being said, I don&#8217;t even think 80% of the people would be willing to give it a shot. That being said, trying to stop Ovechkin as a goalie is probably exactly what the authors of the poll had intended, so next time I&#8217;ll try to get more of a clue when I&#8217;m writing my clueless response. Thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwuguy1</title>
		<link>http://www.luckylester.com/2009/02/clueless-voters-1/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>wwuguy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luckylester.com/?p=2590#comment-388</guid>
		<description>gotta love a column about clueless voters written by a clueless columnist ... while i agree with the spirit of your argument lester, ovechkin is a left winger for the caps so typically he wouldn&#039;t be standing between the pipes during a shootout ... i think the authors of the poll intended to match the readers up AS the goalie and trying to stop ovechkin&#039;s shot, in which case they still wouldn&#039;t stand a chance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta love a column about clueless voters written by a clueless columnist &#8230; while i agree with the spirit of your argument lester, ovechkin is a left winger for the caps so typically he wouldn&#8217;t be standing between the pipes during a shootout &#8230; i think the authors of the poll intended to match the readers up AS the goalie and trying to stop ovechkin&#8217;s shot, in which case they still wouldn&#8217;t stand a chance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

